🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are observing closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing group of countries are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". Legislation could be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban could be "one of the tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has urged parliament to pass a bill increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a comparable action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended parents to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a good first step," stated a leading parliamentarian driving the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Last year, momentum built behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. One foundation founded by the relatives of a girl who died after viewing disturbing online content suggests that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are appropriate and fit for minors," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, action is mostly unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills demanding parental consent for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various individuals to follow Australia's example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Beyond the West, other nations are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, global organizations take a more nuanced stance. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

Even as this international discussion evolves, the policies of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that states globally are no longer prepared to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.